Jim'sMoneyBlog

Financial Opinion and Insights

Archive for the ‘Financial Literacy’ Category

Market Guesswork Can Come Back to Haunt.

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

People have been wondering what the stock market will do since they first began trading under the buttonwood tree in lower Manhattan.

I read an article – one of a zillion such articles that always get multiple opinions from people who invariably prove they never had a clue to begin with – yesterday by Gil Weinreich, writing for AdvisorOne,  You can find a link to it on the IFG Facebook page; and this from the article caught my eye:

“The most recent Chicago Booth/Kellogg School Financial Trust Index indicates that 47% of the public expects the stock market to plunge in the next 12 weeks, according to Wharton professor Olivia Mitchell. Mitchell’s own portfolio has outperformed the stock market since 1999, when she put all her investments in Treasury inflation-protected securities. Her difficulty today, however, is figuring out what to do now that TIPS are paying negative returns.”

The professor put ALL her investments in TIPS.   Translation:  She was ‘timing the market’.  Not the stock market, but the bond market.  And, she’s got lucky.    But, there was a price.    Those who ride high on one side are often in danger of getting ‘whipsawed’ on the other.   

The market giveth and the market taketh away. 

The professor isn’t alone.  Many intelligent people – the same people who would never build a home without a blueprint, or launch a business without a well thought-out business plan – often make investment decisions and asset allocations based on an outlook, which means it’s virtually always without a long-term written investment plan.  It’s important to note there is NO professionally-written plan on earth, for a home, business, or investments, that would use only one material, or concentrate all risk into one sector.

Risk concentration isn’t a strategy.  It’s a guess.  It’s a hope.  Yet, too many Americans do it all the time.  It’s called ‘chasing returns’.

It doesn’t work.

It’s never worked.

Some point to past successes, similar to the example above; but, those always end-up being short-term.  When you calculate the returns over time – and one might argue the professor’s track record since ’99 isn’t exactly short-term – it’s also true that returns are now negative and her investment life isn’t over yet – and won’t be for many years to come.

Anyone who’s attended a large gathering of financial types knows the room is always filled with better-than-average investors; yet, few – although the number may be closer to ‘none’ – can even beat the indexes consistently.

It’s not about being brilliant; it’s about being smart.  Being smart really all about knowing what you don’t know… it’s about managing risk, not money… you just do it with money…. And market risk is only one of them.

Jim

—————–

Jim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.  

The Independent Financial GroupAdditional IFG Links:

 

IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description. Opinions expressed are those of the author.  IFG does not provide legal or tax advice and nothing contained herein should be construed as  securities  or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment to the individual reader.  The general information provided should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from an appropriate licensed professional.  The Independent Financial Group does not sell financial products or securities and nothing contained herein is an offer or recommendation to purchase any security or the services of any person or organization.

Are Risk Questionnaires A Waste of Time?

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

Are these things worth anything? … or nothing.

Risk questionnaires have played a major role in retirement and investment planning for as long as I can remember; and I’ve used them no less religiously than any other advisor.   Frankly, I’ve always felt they were a little stupid.

Elmer Duckhunter walks into Brainy Smartsuit’s office at Behemoth Securities.  It’s a beautiful place, full of mahogany with lots of beautiful brochures in the lobby.   Brainy has been successful at Behemoth, gaining promotion to Sr. Vice President after selling more Secure Your Future product than anyone else in the office using the “Secret in a Box” software supplied by the product wholesaler. 

“How can I help you?”, Brainy asks.

“Well,” says Elmer, “I have a lot of money from all those Tractor Pulls I won and I think it’s time I began investing for my future.  What should I invest in?”

“I think I can help you, but first I have to know more about you!”

“Makes sense.  What do you want to know?”

Brainy pulls out the Behemoth Risk Assessment questionnaire.  “First, I’d like to know a little about how you feel about investing.”

“Okay.”  Elmer settles in.  “How many questions are there?”

Brainy smiles, “Just six.”

“Six?  You can learn everything you need to know about me with just six questions?”

“Trust me.  This is very scientific, “says Brainy.

“Okay.”

Brainy begins.  “On a scale of zero to 10, how much risk do you feel you can handle?”

“I don’t know.  What would a ‘five’ feel like?”, asks Elmer.

“Just pick one that you feel comfortable with, says Brainy.  “The people who prepare these know what they’re doing.”

Elmer thinks for a second.  “Well, back in 2007 I was a 9, but after the crash I was a 2.  Now, I don’t know what I am.  That’s why I’m here!”

“Well, I can’t tell you how much risk to take until you tell me how much risk you want; then, I can tell you what you told me and we’ll have the answer!”

“Huh?”

They both look at each other, then Elmer continues, “How much risk do I want?  Seems to me you should be telling me how much risk I need or don’t need!”

“But what if it’s more than you want?”, asks Brainy.

“I don’t know how much I want.  I need to know how much I should or should not have?

Brainy perks up.  “Now we’re getting somewhere.  What are your goals?”

“Simple”, says Elmer, “to retire with as much money as possible with as little risk as necessary.”

“How much is that?”

“How should I know?  You tell me.”

Brainy senses a lack of forward progress.  “Let’s come back to that.   Try this one:  If your portfolio went down, what would you do?”

“I’d probably ask you for advice!  Isn’t that your job?”  Elmer’s beginning to wonder if Brainy Smartsuit is so smart after all.  “Why are you asking me all this.  I just want to know what I should be doing!”

Brainy comes clean.  “We have regulatory compliance concerns.  We have to make sure what we recommend is consistent with how you feel about investing.”

“I’d rather have advice that’s consistent with what I need,” says Elmer.  Are you protecting me or your firm?

“Well, actually, both…”

“There are six of these?”  Elmer’s fed up.   He puts on his duck hunter cap with earflaps, and stomps out of the office.

Maybe these questionnaires can shed some light about attitudes; but, they don’t tell Elmer what he needs to know.  Elmer just wants to know what he should be doing and why.

Once he understands what and why, the rest gets easier.  Fear can exist only where there’s a knowledge vacuum.    When knowledge replaces ignorance, fear dissipates and understanding prevails.

Maybe questionnaires have zero to do with long term success for the client; but, they maybe do help sell more Secure Your Future product.

—————————–

The Independent Financial GroupSubscribe to IFG Insights letters for individual investors.

Visit IFG on Facebook:  Facebook.com/IFGAdvisory

Follow Jim on Twitter:  @JimLorenzen

Jim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.   IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting and wealth management services for individual investors. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author and fictitious names were created solely for their entertainment value and are not meant to represent any person or organization living or dead.  IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  IFG also does not provide tax or legal advice.  The reader should seek competent counsel to address those issues.  Content contained herein represents the author’s opinion and should not be regarded as investment advice which is provided only to IFG clients upon completion of a written plan.  The Independent Financial You can reach Jim at 805.265.5416 or through the IFG website, www.indfin.com

Good Retirement Issue from Money Magazine!

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

As much as I’ve been an unabashed critic of most of the financial media, I can’t help but noting that Money magazine’s October Retirement Guide issue has some excellent articles about preparing for retirement; and I recommend picking up a hard copy to pass around to family members.  Articles in this issue discuss things most people simply don’t think about in advance.

Back in 2005, it became obvious that my parents back in Florida could no longer take care of themselves.  Mom had broken a hip and was in a health center recovering from surgery – and the anesthesia didn’t help the Alzheimer’s which was then in its early stages.  Meanwhile, dad, who was living alone while mom was in rehab, could barely get around.  He had lung cancer, though he hadn’t told us about it and I’m not sure he even knew.

My wife and I made three trips between California and Florida over a six week period:  Arranging  financial and legal matters, home care for dad and mom when she arrived, selling their home, and prepping our home for their arrival, i.e., outfitting bedrooms, bathrooms, etc., and arranging for in-home care in our home for them when they arrived.

There was a lot we didn’t know and we had to learn on the fly.  This issue of Money – look for the Retirement Guide sub-heading –  is certainly worth reading and talking about with your family.  It also asks some good questions like, “Who will change your light bulbs when you can’t?  Do you trust them?”  The answers may not be as easy as you think.

If you can’t wait to get a hard copy, you can read some of the articles here.

Jim

———————

Subscribe to IFG Insights letters for individual investors.The Independent Financial Group

Visit IFG on Facebook:  Facebook.com/IFGAdvisory

Follow Jim on Twitter:  @JimLorenzen

Jim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.   IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting and wealth management services for individual investors. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author and fictitious names were created solely for their entertainment value and are not meant to represent any person or organization living or dead.  IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  IFG also does not provide tax or legal advice.  The reader should seek competent counsel to address those issues.  Content contained herein represents the author’s opinion and should not be regarded as investment advice which is provided only to IFG clients upon completion of a written plan.  The Independent Financial You can reach Jim at 805.265.5416 or through the IFG website, www.indfin.com

Written by Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

October 31, 2012 at 8:00 am

Scattered Assets Can Be More Than Risky

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

They can be expensive, too!

What are scattered assets?  Many people have multiple investment accounts, often with multiple brokerages and or mutual fund companies.  There are even those who have multiple institutional managers in separately managed accounts.

And, all this is in the name of diversification.  I just wrote about this in our ezine which you can find on the IFG Insights Archive.  But, here’s an overview:

Problem is, most of these people aren’t diversified at all?  In fact, rather than reducing risk, they may actually be increasing it! 

There are three issues at play – issues many often ignore:

  • Duplication is not diversification.   But, there’s more:  Few people realize that you can’t really diversify-away market risk.  Think about it: If you bought stocks in the ENTIRE stock market, you’d only be replicating market risk, not eliminating it.
  • Mutual funds contain hidden taxes.  Sure, most people know that; but, what they may not know is this:  They don’t own the underlying fund holdings; they are shareholders of the investment company and as such they share in the fund’s capital gains.  If the fund sold a stock they bought ages ago at a low price and now has large unrealized gains; the shareholder will share in ALL of those gains, even if the stock is sold just after the investor bought-in!
  • Tax inefficiency.   This happens when there are multiple managers, even if one of them is the client, in addition, buying securities in his own online account.  The duplication mentioned above can result in some real costs that can far outweigh any perceived savings.  Again, you’ll find a detailed example in this morning’s IFG Insights, which you can find in our archive.

Like Warren Buffet once said, if you think investing is fun, the odds are great you’re doing something very wrong.

Enjoy!

——————

IFG BlogJim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.   IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting to retirement plan sponsors, and retirement and wealth management services for individual investors. IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  IFG also does not provide tax or legal advice.  The reader should seek competent counsel to address those issues.  Content contained herein represents the author’s opinion and should not be regarded as investment advice which is provided only to IFG clients upon completion of a written plan.  The Independent Financial You can reach Jim at 805.265.5416 or through the IFG website, www.indfin.com, and by subscribing to IFG Insights letters  for  individual investors.  Keep up to date with IFG on Twitter: @JimLorenzen

Written by Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

October 9, 2012 at 7:45 am

Is ANY Advisor Truly Unbiased?

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®Probably not.

Everyone has some bias.

It doesn’t matter what an advisor’s business model is, each has its own built-in bias.  And, let’s face it, it’s probably true of every business model in any business.  It doesn’t mean the advisor isn’t honest or does quality work, it’s just good that you know that bias always exists.

Here’s the bias of the four primary business models.

  • Commission:  The bias may favor products that pay higher commissions.
  • Hourly fees:  The bias may favor stretching-out the work to increase income.
  • Asset-based fees:  The bias may favor advice given on existing assets to maintain higher asset levels.
  • Flat retainer fees:  The bias may favor doing less work – reduced incentive to work longer

The bottom-line:  The advisor, like any other professional, must be someone you trust to be acting in your best interest.  After all, the form of compensation doesn’t necessarily dictate ethics standards. 

Regardless of the compensation, I would simply ask if the advisor is willing to put in writing that s/he will actually accept fiduciary status in ALL his/her dealings with you, both in the planning stage and in the implementation stage.

If the standard is ‘suitability’, the advisor has wide latitude as long as the investments are ‘suitable’.  If the standard is ‘fiduciary’, the advisor MUST act in YOUR best interests.  The standard they’re willing to accept – in writing – can tell you a lot.

And, that may tell you all you need to know.

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

—————————-

IFG BlogJim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.  IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting to retirement plan sponsors and selected individual investors.  IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment to the individual reader.  The general information provided should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from an appropriate licensed professional. 

Additional IFG Links:

Written by Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

July 24, 2012 at 8:15 am

How to Recognize Investment Service Models

IFG BlogThe average investor can often have a difficult time understanding just how different investment professionals operate and who they’re really dealing with.

There are three basic service model environments where investment professionals can be found; but, what can make these environments even more difficult to understand is that it’s possible for two to be combined… or one can be masqueraded to look like something else entirely!   When you add to all that the alphabet soup of credentials and designations – some excellent and most meaningless – it’s no wonder the average investor has trouble figuring it all out.

While it would be impossible to address everything without writing a book, here’s an admittedly cursory overview of the three environments.  All have their selling points and negatives – and none is intrinsically better than the other –  but, since I’ve worked in all three, maybe I can help shed a little light on this and make them a little easier to understand.

1.      The Captive Registered Representative

This is how many, including yours truly, began their careers; and, in fact, many never leave!  The captive RR is someone you may know as a stockbroker, although the broker-dealer is actually the employer firm and the person you’re thinking of is a Registered Representative of the broker-dealer firm.   These firms can be the well-known large ‘wire houses’ with widely-recognized names or they can be smaller regional or even local firms.  In all captives, the RR is an employee of the firm and it is the firm that must sign ‘selling agreements’ with outside product providers if the RRs are going to offer anything other than in-house product.

I began my career in such a firm that provided all the services and infrastructure.  The job of an RR was is to generate revenue for the firm.  The hierarchy looked something like this:

What you may not know:  In the old days, these large firms made most of their money from their own packaged in-house proprietary product, including mutual funds, unit investment trusts (UITs), and other offerings.  I don’t know how true that is today – my guess is it’s probably much less so than in those days.   The reason I think this is because the wirehouse industry’s margins have been declining steadily over the years, indicating fewer proprietary product sales and evidenced by (1) a greater number of mergers that never seem to end, and (2) the fact that broker payouts – the percentage they pay their RRs on generated revenues – have been declining.  Brokers throughout the industry are having a tougher time ‘keeping their desks’ as margins have put pressure on RRs to increase revenue production.  This may be a reason why some, if not all, within that community are resisting the adoption of a fiduciary standard.

As I said, some RRs never leave the large wirehouses, for a variety of reasons, including the large in-house back-office infrastructure support, etc.   And, let’s face it, some may not be cut-out for self-employment.  For those who are, they often take the next step.

2.     The Independent Registered Representative

Some RRs who don’t want to remain ‘captive’ often want to set-out on their own and open up a private practice.  When a RR makes the decision to ‘break free’, they have to pay their own bills.  In my early days, that meant getting office space, phones connected, office furniture, supplies, and paying for my own insurance and a thousand and one other things; but, I could now select my own broker-dealer (BD) to function as my back-office and process all the paperwork through the various providers, etc.   

There are hundreds of BDs available to the independent RRs and they come in all shapes and sizes with different attributes.   Since my need was primarily for back-office processing, I wanted one that had (1) prompt and quality personal service, and (2) good relationships with quality custodians and other service providers.  Today, almost all can probably fit that bill.   While the RR is not an employee of the BD, the BD must still have Selling Agreements with product providers before the RR can access them for his/her clients.

One of the things about independence that independent RRs like is that the hierarchy can be flipped, which, to my mind, creates more of a ‘client first’ environment.

What you may not know:  An independent RR may be operating out of a small office in your local community; but, don’t let that fool you.  That independent likely has access to a huge array of institutional money managers and widely respected and recognized asset custodians and other service providers.   In fact, it wouldn’t be at all surprising if your local RR office actually had a wider menu of availabilities than the major wirehouse down the street, since many BD operations have provided their RRs with greater access to the marketplace.   An independent is far more likely able to provide you with a choice of custodians, etc., than a captive whose employer itself may want to be the custodian.

Something else you may not know:   Ever walk into your local bank branch and see the investment desk sitting somewhere in the lobby or off to the side?   When you sit down at that desk, you may think you’re still in the bank; but, guess again.  There’s no FDIC insurance there!  The likely scenario:  Some BD has signed a deal with the bank to private-label a brokerage service.  Not bad; you should simply be aware.

3.  The Independent Fiduciary Model:  The “pure” fee-only Registered Investment Advisor (RIA)

Some independent RRs finally decide to complete the process:  They want to drop all sales and commissions and gain access to the entire world of products and service providers, including those who don’t work through sales channels.  In my case, since I had already been in business in my own office for fifteen years, it was a simple process to register as an advisor and simply drop all the selling licenses.  An RIA must avoid conflicts of interest and operate under a fiduciary standard:  The clients’ interests must be paramount.

The model, however, looks much like the independent RR:

What you may not know:   Captive RRs and independent RRs both very likely work for or with a BD that is dually-registered, making the RRs also RIA representatives.  This allows them to work on a fee basis, as well as on commission.  Some will tout their fiduciary status during the planning stage; but, you should ask if they will operate under that status during the investment implementation stage.  It’s one thing to “adopt a fiduciary standard’ and quite enough to accept fiduciary status in writing.  From what I’ve observed, few, if any, BDs will allow their RRs to accept this status, whether they’re captive or independent.   That doesn’t mean they aren’t honest or that they don’t do good work; it’s just something you should be aware of.

Also be aware that some RIA firms provide investment management, asset custody, and portfolio reporting services all in-house while others prefer to work in a purely advisory capacity using third-party providers for the various services. 

Example:  In my own practice, most clients’ assets receive custody services from Pershing (owned by Bank of New York-Mellon).  All institutional managers are independent of the custodian and all portfolio reporting is provided by third-party services independent of the managers.  All parties are compensated by client fees only, as are my advisory services.   While it may sound like more fees, it’s often actually less.  All these services are usually ‘bundled’ by investment providers; I just unbundle them and ‘shop’ them individually, which can result in savings.

While this overview just scratches the service, it might give you some idea of the playing field.  In the final analysis, choosing an advisor is a personal choice.  You should find someone you’re comfortable with… and someone who will talk with you like an adult.  Avoid the ‘glad handers’ who tell you what you want to hear; find one that will talk straight and tell you what you need to hear, even if you think you’re an investment genius.  

Good luck!

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

—————————

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®Jim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.  IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting to retirement plan sponsors and selected individual investors.  IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  Nothing contained in this material is intended to constitute legal, tax, securities, or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment to the individual reader.  The general information provided should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from an appropriate licensed professional. 

 

Additional IFG Links:

 

IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  IFG does not provide legal or tax advice and nothing contained herein should be construed as  securities  or investment advice, nor an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment to the individual reader.  The general information provided should not be acted upon without obtaining specific legal, tax, and investment advice from an appropriate licensed professional.  The Independent Financial Group does not sell financial products or securities and nothing contained herein is an offer or recommendation to purchase any security or the services of any person or organization.

Three Retirement Rollover Mistakes to Avoid

Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

IFG BlogPlanning to retire?  Contemplating a rollover?  Here are three ways NOT to do it.

1. Get a check from the company

Of course, this is just foolish. The company must withhold 20% from the payment, so that a person with a $100,000 account will have $20,000 withheld, and will receive a check for $80,000. In order to complete a tax-free rollover, the taxpayer must deposit that $80,000 in an IRA plus $20,000 from their pocket to complete a tax-free $100,000 rollover.

The taxpayer may eventually get the $20,000 withheld as a tax refund the following year, but that will not help their cash flow, as they need to complete their IRA rollover within 60 days of receiving the check from their qualified plan.

The bottom line is that people should never touch their qualified funds. The only sensible way to move funds is a direct transfer from the qualified plan to the IRA custodian and avoid withholding.

2. Rollover company stock

Shares of employer stock get special tax treatment, and in many cases, it may be fine to ignore this special status and roll the shares to an IRA. This would be true when the amount of employer stock is small, or the basis of the shares is high relative to the current market value.

However, in the case of large amounts of shares or low basis, it would be a very costly mistake not to use the Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA) Rules.[1]

If your company retirement account includes highly appreciated company stock, an option is to withdraw the stock, pay tax on it now, and roll the balance of the plan assets to an IRA. This way you will pay no current tax on the Net Unrealized Appreciation (NUA), or on the amount rolled over to the IRA. The only tax you pay now would be on the cost of the stock (the basis) when acquired by the plan.

If you withdraw the stock and are under 55 years old, you have to pay a 10% penalty (the penalty is only applied to the amount that is taxable).

IRA owners can then defer the tax on the NUA until they sell the stock. When you do sell, you will only pay tax at the current capital gains rate. To qualify for the tax deferral on NUA, the distribution must be a lump-sum distribution, meaning that all of the employer’s stock in your plan account must be distributed.

3. Rollover after-tax dollars

Sometimes, qualified plan accounts contain after-tax dollars. At the time of rollover, it is preferable to remove these after-tax dollars, and not roll them to an IRA. That way, if the account owner chooses to use the after-tax dollars, he will have total liquidity to do so.

You can take out all of the after-tax contributions, tax-free, before rolling the qualified plan dollars to an IRA. You also have the option to rollover pre-tax and after-tax funds from a qualified plan to an IRA and allow all the money to continue to grow tax-deferred.

The big question is, “will you need the money soon?” If so, it probably will not pay to rollover the after-tax money to an IRA, because once you roll over after-tax money to an IRA, you cannot withdraw it tax-free. The after-tax funds become part of the IRA, and any withdrawals from the IRA are subject to the “Pro Rata Rule.”

The Pro Rata Rule requires that each distribution from an IRA contain a proportionate amount of both the taxable and non-taxable amounts in the account. The non-taxable amounts are called “basis.” In an IRA, the basis is the amount of non-deductible contributions made to the IRA.

————–Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

This Guide is an excerpt from Six Best and Worst Rollover Decisions by Jim Lorenzen. 

Jim Lorenzen is a Certified Financial Planner® and An Accredited Investment Fiduciary® in his 21st year of private practice as Founding Principal of The Independent Financial Group, a fee-only registered investment advisor with clients located in New York, Florida, and California.   IFG provides investment and fiduciary consulting to retirement plan sponsors, and retirement and wealth management services for individual investors. IFG does not sell products, earn commissions, or accept any third-party compensation or incentives of any description.  IFG also does not provide tax or legal advice.  The reader should seek competent counsel to address those issues.  Content contained herein represents the author’s opinion and should not be regarded as investment advice which is provided only to IFG clients upon completion of a written plan.  The Independent Financial You can reach Jim at 805.265.5416 or through the IFG website, www.indfin.com, the IFG Investment Blog and by subscribing to IFG Insights letters for corporate plan sponsors and individual investors.  Keep up to date with IFG on Twitter: @JimLorenzen


[1]IRS Publication 575

Written by Jim Lorenzen, CFP®, AIF®

June 28, 2012 at 8:00 am